How does millar’s description of the roman government compare to polybius’ description? the following text is from the crowd in the late republic, written by professor fergus millar in 1998. the book focuses on the role of roman people in the government during the final decades of the roman republic. millar is a british historian and professor of ancient history at oxford university. the greek historian polybius in his book the histories written between 167-119 bce, a period of rapid roman expansion. polybius greatly admired the romans, and the purpose of his work was to describe how rome came to dominate the world.

Based on this information, the difference between Millar's description and Polybius' description is the fact that Millar is a modern scholar and based on his description, he is more likely to be objective in his assessment of the Roman Empire. Polybius is an ancient scholar, and a great admirer of the Roman empire. These two qualities suggest that he might be less objective when analyzing the history of the empire.

the government paid religious orders to provide basic education to native american children on reservations. in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the bureau of indian affairs (bia) founded additional boarding schools based on the assimilation model of the off-reservation carlisle indian industrial school.