There should be no minimum voting age. which statement about the claim is true? a. it is defensible but not arguable. b. it is both arguable and defensible. c. it is neither arguable nor defensible. d. it is arguable but not defensible.

The correct answer is D. It is arguable but not defensible

Explanation:

A claim or thesis statement is a statement used in argumentative texts or persuasive speech to convince the audience about a certain idea, because of this a claim needs to be arguable which means not everyone agrees with it and defensible which means as although everyone does not agree with the claim there is evidence to explain it and prove it. In the case of the thesis statement "There should be no minimum voting age" this claim is arguably because is somehow controversial and not everyone agrees with it, but it is not defensible as the author of this statement might not find evidence to prove this as all evidence shows because of maturity, literacy, education, and other factors there has to be a minimum voting age. Therefore, the statement about this claim that is true is that it is arguable but not defensible.

he believed that congress would be better not dealing with "lobbyists", or people who seek to influence (a politician or public official) on an issue, since historically, they had problems with these kinds of people. he thought lobbying produces benefits, but should be carefully monitored.

i think they came to washington to protest