Think about the u. s. participation in the war in europe. how might the axis have benefited by gaining control of the united kingdom by 1942

Assuming this takes place before the USSR joined the war in June 1941, the war would have been won. Up until that point pretty much all of Europe had been taken over, and so if Britsinbhad not held out until 1941 Nazi Germany would have won the war.

However, to answer your question they would have had an easier time against the USSR and the USA, presuming that Operation Barbarossa still takes place and so does Pearl Harbour.

This is because although Britain was bankrupt(and obviously the land less would have ended) and so had no monetary funds, but its Empire meant that assuming the entire Empire swore aliiegance to Nazi Germany rather than continuing to fight despite Great Britainbitself being conquered, they would have lots of land and some extra troops from around the enpire to that would have benefited all fronts of the war. Also the Germans would have the Supermaribe Spitfires, Lancaster Bombers and Hawker Hurricanes (this is assuming that all British planes are not destroyed during the Blitzkrieg plan) with which to fill the gaps in their Luftwaffe, which was heavily depleted in the Battle of Britain. They would also have the schematics for the Spitfire, allowing them to build more, the Spirfire was a very useful plane.

on 6 november american voters will elect members of the house of representatives and the senate, which together are called congress.

both houses of congress are currently controlled by the republican party, which backs president donald trump.

the democrats think they can win control of the house of representatives this year by winning a majority of seats.

doing so would let them block or delay the president’s plans by refusing to enact them.

all 435 seats in the house of representatives are up for election.

if the democrats want to take control of the house by having the most seats, they’re going to have to claim at least 23 from the republicans.

graphic: the battle for the house of representatives

nationalization is the set of dispositions and operations by means of which the state assumes, in varied form, the administration of private companies, of groups of companies or of the totality of certain economic sectors previously managed by individuals, such as the land portions. nationalization is the opposite of privatization. it is also called nationalization of the means of production, although a nationalized company can be previously both national and foreign ownership. nationalization or nationalization is a very characteristic action of ideologies such as socialism and nationalism.