subject
History, 28.07.2019 00:30 LillyPrince

The sixth amendment says that a person who is accused of a crime has the right to a jury trial. in a jury trial, regular citizens determine if the accused person is guilty or not guilty. which of the following might happen if citizens did not have this right? a- the government might be able to send an accused person to jail for unfair reasons. b- it might be easier for suspects who are guilty of crimes to win their cases and go free. c- police might not be able to arrest suspects for crimes, even if they had proper evidence. d- it might be impossible to keep records of everything that was said during the course of a trial.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 20.06.2019 18:04
Government supported programs to the needy have continued since roosevelt's time. examples would be the government programs that local economies and programs that provide health care for children. these programs are expensive and cost the citizens money in the form of taxes. do you think that the government should still continue to people in need or should people have to take care of themselves? explain your answer.
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 17:30
The segments shown below could form a triangle.
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 17:30
Whose writings were the source of the idea that people have a right to abolish and replace a government that violates their natural rights?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Define what the expropriation without compensation's and what does the freedom charter says about it
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The sixth amendment says that a person who is accused of a crime has the right to a jury trial. in a...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 02.07.2021 23:20
Questions on the website: 13722361