subject
History, 11.10.2019 14:30 Anthonyc123

Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary sources have over primary sources for historians?
a. they can offer historians a firsthand interpretation of an important event.
b. they can provide a general summary of evidence other historians have discovered.
c. they can act as hard evidence to prove whether a society used a particular tool.
d. they can reveal to a historian exactly how people of an ancient culture lived.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 16:30
How did william penn come on possession of land in the new world
Answers: 3
question
History, 21.06.2019 21:30
How does a comet change when it comes close to the sun
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:30
Could anything have been done through compromise to stop it, or did it have to happen?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
Which of the following arguments decided the debate over using the atomic bomb against japan in 1945? using the bomb would destroy the armaments still available to japanese forces in japan. using the bomb would demonstrate the power of the united states to the entire world. using the bomb would shorten the war and avoid heavy casualties among invading troops. using the bomb would enable allied forces to invade and take over the japanese mainland
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary sources have over primary sources for h...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 19.08.2020 20:01
question
Mathematics, 19.08.2020 20:01
question
Mathematics, 19.08.2020 20:01
question
Mathematics, 19.08.2020 20:01
Questions on the website: 13722362