subject
History, 25.07.2019 20:30 alexandradumit3086

In katz v united states, the supreme court ruled that tapping a public phone without warrant violated the defendant’s: a: freedom of assembly b: protection against unreasonable search and seizure c: protection against double jeopardy d: right to avoid self-incrimination

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:10
Need it now explain gorbachev’s policy of glasnost. how did this policy change the soviet union?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:00
How did slavery end in the united statesa. it ended with the emancipation proclamationb. it ended when the union won the civil warc. it ended with the fifteenth amendmentd. it ended with the 13th amendment
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:50
List 3 impacts wwii had on canada.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:30
What was one striking development of the golden age of prehistory?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In katz v united states, the supreme court ruled that tapping a public phone without warrant violate...
Questions
question
English, 19.01.2021 06:20
Questions on the website: 13722361