Smany points
which best states how responses to the scott v. sandford decision differed in the north and south?
a. people in the north agreed with part of the decision, while people in the south agreed with all of it.
b. people in the north disagreed with the whole decision, while people in the south only agreed with part of it.
c. people in both the north and south disagreed with the whole decision.
d. people in the south welcomed the decision, while people in the north feared it.

option d is correct. corroborated sources of historical evidence   is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history.

historians tend to use written sources, but audio and visual materials as well as artifacts are important objects that supply information to modern historians.

historical sources are usually divided into two categories: primary and secondary sources. depending on the historian's intent, some sources shift their designation. determining what type of sources toimplement, and the level of credibility and reliability of those sources, is a significant step in critical thinking for the historian.

explanation:

macon. i believe thats the answer

sorry if im wrong.