How did marcus garvey's approach to civil rights differ from that of the naacp? a. garvey supported the ku klux klan, while the naacp opposed it. b. garvey was opposed to integration, while the naacp fought for integration. c. garvey opposed the harlem renaissance, while the naacp supported it. d. garvey was pro-american, while the naacp was pro-communist.

Garvey felt that equality was impossible in the United States, while the NAACP fought for equality.

the three-fifths compromise was proposed by james wilson and roger sherman, who were both delegates for the constitutional convention of 1787. however, the three-fifth compromise has its roots further back in history, dating back to the continental congress in 1783. the compromise was a result of the apportionment of taxes being related to land values.

hope this : )

ummm? is that supposed to be a question or a but this is a reason he won re-election

explanation:

"despite progress in the war, lincoln and most political pundits were convinced that he would lose his bid for reelection in 1864. the country was war weary and the democratic party's nominee, george mcclellan, was likely to negotiate a peace treaty with the confederacy if elected." - loc.gov