Which of the following is a valid defense to a defamation claim?
a. the statement was true.
b. the person making the statement made it only to the plaintiff, not to any third parties.
c. the statement was only an opinion.
d. all of these answers.

d. All of the answers are valid defense to defamation claim.

Defamation is a false accusation of one person to damage the reputation of other person or party. It is the false statement of actual fact. A person or party making a defamatory statement can be a privileged or a normal person.

If he/she is qualified and privileged, he/she should prove that the defamation is intentional or ill-will. In either case, one must prove the defamation in a legal way. The major defenses to a defamation claim are declaring the truth, qualified or absolute privilege, accept that it was a statement of opinion, written consent about the defamation, and defamation is made against someone else or third party.

"quid pro quo" harassment takes place when a supervisor requires sex, sexual favors, or sexual contact from an employee/job candidate as a condition of their employment. only supervisors who have the authority to make tangible employment actions (i.e. hire, fire, promote, can commit "quid pro quo" harassment.