Consider again the harris v. forklift case at the end of chapter 1 "introduction to law and legal systems". the supreme court ruled that ms. harris was entitled to be heard again by the federal district court, which means that there would be a trial on her claim that mr. hardy, owner of forklift systems, had created a "hostile working environment" for ms. harris. apart from the legal aspects, did he really do anything unethical? how can you tell?

Cases that arent resloved through plea bargaining or by a jury trial are decided by a judge in a /an? a.indictment b.grand jury c.arraignment d.bench trial

John, a 34 year old father of two children, is a member of a health maintenance organization (hmo) in texas. john has made several trips to an area clinic recommended by his hmo to seek medical attention since finding blood in his bowel movements. he has been taking large amounts of aspirin for persistent headaches but did not realize that this could cause internal bleeding. john was always seen at the clinic by a physician assistant, robert m. but never by a physician. robert didn't ask john about taking any nonprescription medications. john didn't realize that he should mention his over the counter medication (aspirin) consumption. robert tells john to take an antacid preparation to control the bleeding, but does not order any tests. he tells john to return if he is not any better. two days later, john is rushed to the area emergency room with a bowel hemorrhage.1-¿what responsibility, if any, does robert have for john's emergency? 2- does the clinic have a responsibility to provide its hmo members with the services of a physician? 3- what responsibility, as a healthcare consumer, does john have for his own medical condition?

Vehicle #1 skidded 50 ft before impact with a drag factor of 0.80, how far from impact was vehicle #1 when vehicle #2 first began to accelerate from being stopped?