What are everyone's thoughts on united states v. jones? do you agree? let's say a government ruling said they could monitor everyone 24/7 via tracking devices, phone data, etc. wouldn't that be good for law-abiding citizens and stop criminals. this isn't a question from school or a test i'm just curious about someone else thoughts. i only see criminals being against monitoring, since they have something to hide.

Asubject in a clinical research trial experiences a serious, unanticipated adverse drug experience. how should the investigator proceed, with respect to the irb, after the discovery of the adverse event occurrence? a. do not report the adverse drug experience to the irb since it is a common adverse experience. b. report the adverse drug experience to the irb only if there are several other occurrences. c. report the adverse drug experience as part of the continuing review report. d. report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner, in keeping with the irb's policies and procedures, using the forms or the mechanism provided by the irb.

How would you answer this question. how could you build your practice as an educator for equity, diversity, and inclusion to avoid the oppression of marginalized populations of students?

What is one form of speech that is not protected by the u.s. constitution? a. speech about religion b. political speech about a candidate c. speech protesting the government d. speech that is slanderous