Baxter manufactures elec- tric hair dryers. julie purchases a baxter dryer from her local ace drugstore. cox, a friend and guest in julie’s home, has taken a shower and wants to dry her hair. julie tells cox to use the new baxter hair dryer that she has just purchased. as cox plugs in the dryer, sparks fly out from the motor, and sparks continue to fly as she oper- ates it. despite this, cox begins drying her hair. suddenly, the entire dryer ignites into flames, severely burning cox’s scalp. cox sues baxter on the basis of negligence and strict liability in tort. baxter admits that the dryer was defective but denies liability, particularly because cox was not the person who purchased the dryer. in other words, cox had no contractual relationship with baxter. discuss the valid- ity of baxter’s defense. are there any other defenses that baxter might assert to avoid liability? discuss fully. (se