Australia has a law that requires owners of incoming pets to produce evidence that their pets have had rabies inoculation shots to ensure that they do not have rabies that could be introduced into the local animal population. Because of this law, people who like to travel with their pets typically end up smuggling their non-inoculated pets into the country. And since the most likely source of a rabies outbreak in Australia is a smuggled non-inoculated pet, people are calling for the abolishment of the law. Which of the following is the best statement of the flaw in the argument above1. The likelilhood of a rables outbreak decreases if the quarantine law is abolished 2. The quarantine law forces people to actually break the law and smuggle their pets. 3. Pets with rabies can easily enter Australia if the law was abolished.