What most accurately captures a criticism about the requirement to take bar examinations in order to become a licensed lawyer? a. Bar exams "cost too much and exact great liabilities" b. Bar exams "psychologically tax the spirit" while "taxing the bar regulators that grade them" c. Bar exams require "extensive preparation without extensive knowledge" d. Bar exams "test too much and too little"

c. Bar exams require "extensive preparation without extensive knowledge"

Explanation:

Finishing law school is not enough for someone to become a lawyer. This is because after graduation, you must pass the BAR exam to be considered a lawyer.

However, this exam is very difficult and requires great preparation from your candidates. The biggest problem with this is that the exam requires a lot of preparation, but little knowledge, since candidates end up getting too attached to concepts and guidelines, decorating them often, and not knowing how to apply them in practice.

This ends up generating professionals with little "cleverness" to solve the cases that are involved, as they are attached to decorated concepts that are not always applicable in the real world.

answer:

explanation:

they will talk your license

answer:

i would say c. campus style

explanation: