subject
Law, 06.04.2020 00:59 williamelmore035

In 1982 in Gainesville, Georgia there was a suspected serial killer on the loose. He was dubbed the Swamp Slasher. He had attacked and killed at least 5 women over the course of a year. His attacks were all very similar in nature. America’s Most Wanted offered a $50,000 reward to anyone providing information through its tip line by December 31, 1982, leading to the arrest of the Swamp Slasher. Debbie Adams was alone at her house in Gainesville when she was attacked by a man. Luckily, her son came home and ran the man off before he could kill Debbie. Debbie and her son gave a description of the man to law enforcement. Law enforcement passed the detailed description along to the media and to the FBI investigating the Swamp Slasher because the attacks seemed very similar. The FBI shared that information with America’s Most Wanted. On December 15, 1982, Charlie Dodd was arrested for the attack on Debbie and for being the Swamp Slasher. Debbie’s and her son’s detailed description of her attacker was an important factor in apprehending Mr. Dodd. On January 4, 1983, Debbie and her son contacted America’s Most Wanted to claim their reward. America’s Most Wanted denied their claim stating that the two were not entitled to it.

Was America’s Most Wanted contractually obligated to pay Debbie and her son the reward money? Why or why not? What would the trial court consider? What would the trial court decide?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Law

question
Law, 15.07.2019 07:10
How does the right to file a lawsuit protect people?
Answers: 3
question
Law, 16.07.2019 01:40
During bad weather, you should travel_the posted speed limit.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 15:10
If you can't get enough sleep, you should a. close your eyes when stopped in traffic b. not drive, period c. drink extra coffee before you drive d. leave earlier so you can drive slower
Answers: 2
question
Law, 16.07.2019 16:10
Which of the following statements best illustrates an argument on whether congress is effective on providing oversight of the bureaucracy? a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b. congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to show more a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b.congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to further their own interests and not necessarily the public interest. c.congress provides effective oversight of the bureaucracy through the budgetary process. d.congress is not effective in providing oversight because of the budget and enabling legislation.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In 1982 in Gainesville, Georgia there was a suspected serial killer on the loose. He was dubbed the...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 18:40
question
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 18:40
question
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 18:40
question
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 18:40
question
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 18:40
question
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 18:40
question
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 18:40
Questions on the website: 13722359