subject
Law, 29.08.2020 01:01 taleiayarbough4544

In United States v. Banks, the Court held that officers must wait a reasonable amount of time after knocking and before forcible entry and that, in this case, a wait satisfied the Fourth Amendment.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Law

question
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
Which of the following best describes the principle of informed consent as described in the belmont report? a. voluntariness, risk/benefit assessment, selection of subjects. b. comprehension, conflicts of interest, risk/benefit ratio. c. risk/benefit assessment, justification of research, comprehension. d. information, comprehension, voluntariness.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 03.07.2019 18:10
What was the effect of the supreme court’s ruling in citizens united v. federal election commission? a. it removed limitations on corporate funding of political broadcasts. b. it removed all limits on campaign contributions by interest groups. c. it prohibited corporations and businesses from contributing to political campaigns. d. it prohibited interest groups from contributing to individual candidates.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 08.07.2019 23:40
Which of the follow statements about drinking alcohol and driving is true
Answers: 1
question
Law, 10.07.2019 01:20
In recent years, there have been two major criticisms of congress and how it promotes the public good. describe these two in two paragraphs
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In United States v. Banks, the Court held that officers must wait a reasonable amount of time after...
Questions
question
Health, 04.05.2021 14:00
question
History, 04.05.2021 14:00
question
Spanish, 04.05.2021 14:00
question
Chemistry, 04.05.2021 14:00
question
English, 04.05.2021 14:00
question
English, 04.05.2021 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722361