subject
Law, 24.09.2020 06:01 Simplytaylorgrenade

The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. —Alexander Hamilton,
Federalist No. 78

Which statement comes closest to summarizing the meaning of this passage?

Courts should not try to interpret the laws.
Courts should interpret laws and the Constitution.
Courts should follow the laws but not the Constitution itself.
Courts should follow the laws of the legislature.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Law

question
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
Within how many days of acquiring or discovering a significant financial interest is the investigator required to submit an updated disclosure to the institution?
Answers: 3
question
Law, 03.07.2019 20:30
What does the first amendment’s right to assemble refer to? the right of a group to express unpopular opinions the right of a group to make false claims the right of a group to meet in groups the right of a group to speak in protest
Answers: 1
question
Law, 06.07.2019 21:10
Yvonne finds a carpenter to do some repairs for her house and tells him that if he finishes the job by saturday she will pay him 1000. yvonne offer creates an blank contract
Answers: 1
question
Law, 11.07.2019 05:30
"magic" mushrooms have effects similar to those of a. lsd b. pcp c. ketamine d. none of the above
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is,...
Questions
question
Health, 04.11.2020 07:50
question
Mathematics, 04.11.2020 07:50
question
Mathematics, 04.11.2020 07:50
Questions on the website: 13722363