subject
Law, 03.12.2020 19:50 m3lp3l

Implied consent laws allow the states to seize the driver's license of anyone who refuses to consent
to urine, blood, or breath tests to determine if the
person was driving under the influence.

True
False

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Law

question
Law, 08.07.2019 03:10
John, a 34 year old father of two children, is a member of a health maintenance organization (hmo) in texas. john has made several trips to an area clinic recommended by his hmo to seek medical attention since finding blood in his bowel movements. he has been taking large amounts of aspirin for persistent headaches but did not realize that this could cause internal bleeding. john was always seen at the clinic by a physician assistant, robert m. but never by a physician. robert didn't ask john about taking any nonprescription medications. john didn't realize that he should mention his over the counter medication (aspirin) consumption. robert tells john to take an antacid preparation to control the bleeding, but does not order any tests. he tells john to return if he is not any better. two days later, john is rushed to the area emergency room with a bowel hemorrhage.1-ΒΏwhat responsibility, if any, does robert have for john's emergency? 2- does the clinic have a responsibility to provide its hmo members with the services of a physician? 3- what responsibility, as a healthcare consumer, does john have for his own medical condition?
Answers: 2
question
Law, 15.07.2019 09:10
Dumb question? (thats me name: ) can a stakeholder be a leader of an organization?
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 18:30
Adefendant charged with driving while intoxicated pleaded not guilty and insisted on a trial. right before the trial began, he fired his attorney and decided to defend himself. at one point during opening arguments, the defendant began to act like a cat, meowing and chasing an imaginary squirrel out of the courtroom. if no one else raises the issue of the defendant's competency to stand trial, what is the responsibility of the trial judge here? a) the trial judge has no responsibility, because the defendant decided to defend himself. b) the trial judge has no responsibility, because she cannot decide whether the defendant is competent to stand trial. c) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the defendant is representinghimself.d) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the constitution obligates her to do.
Answers: 3
question
Law, 16.07.2019 21:20
Quid pro quo sexual harassment typically involves
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Implied consent laws allow the states to seize the driver's license of anyone who refuses to consen...
Questions
question
Biology, 29.02.2020 00:26
question
Mathematics, 29.02.2020 00:26
Questions on the website: 13722359