Civil disobedience . a. respects both positive and natural law. b. violates positive and natural law c. seeks to change natural law.

"Option a" seems to be the correct solution.

Explanation:

A conscientious or even a thoughtful person really shouldn't comply or conform by either a legal statute that would be deeply unequal.  Civil disobedience could reinforce the separation of powers by committing to either the reversal or adjustment of unfair or significantly wrong regulations until the failure to obey the framework benefit of the entire does have a capability of winning effect.  

Other alternatives weren’t linked to the sort of situation in question. So "Option a" is the right experience.