subject
Law, 10.03.2021 14:00 ruslffdr

What if judges were required to incarcerate every defendant found guilty? In what ways would the criminal justice system change

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Law

question
Law, 10.07.2019 01:20
In recent years, there have been two major criticisms of congress and how it promotes the public good. describe these two in two paragraphs
Answers: 2
question
Law, 16.07.2019 16:10
Which of the following statements best illustrates an argument on whether congress is effective on providing oversight of the bureaucracy? a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b. congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to show more a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b.congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to further their own interests and not necessarily the public interest. c.congress provides effective oversight of the bureaucracy through the budgetary process. d.congress is not effective in providing oversight because of the budget and enabling legislation.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 17:20
What does england call its police officers?
Answers: 3
question
Law, 16.07.2019 17:20
Ageneral requirement for informed consent is that no informed consent may include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject’s legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language? a. your participation in this research is voluntary. if you choose not to participate, or change your mind later, your decision will not affect your relationship with the researcher or your right to other services that you may be eligible for. b. taking part in the research is voluntary, but if you choose to take part, you waive the right to legal redress for any research-related injuries. c. the researcher may stop you from taking part in this research without your consent if you experience side effects that make your emotional condition worse. if you become too emotionally distressed during the research, you may have to drop out. d. in the event of any distress you may have related to this research, you will be given access to appropriate resources.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
What if judges were required to incarcerate every defendant found guilty? In what ways would the cri...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 06.02.2020 01:45
Questions on the website: 13722362