Is judicial activism
good Policy for our
Courts to have

Judicial activism is a judicial philosophy holding that the courts can and should go beyond the applicable law to consider broader societal implications of its decisions. It is sometimes used as an antonym of judicial restraint. It is usually a pejorative term, implying that judges make rulings based on their own political agenda rather than precedent and take advantage of judicial discretion. The definition of judicial activism and the specific decisions that are activist are controversial political issues. The question of judicial activism is closely related to judicial interpretation, statutory interpretation, and separation of powers.

Explanation:

"quid pro quo" harassment takes place when a supervisor requires sex, sexual favors, or sexual contact from an employee/job candidate as a condition of their employment. only supervisors who have the authority to make tangible employment actions (i.e. hire, fire, promote, can commit "quid pro quo" harassment.

flexjobs recently identified 14 of the most common remote job titles, spanning a wide variety of skill sets and industries.

check out these positions to see if they're right for you!

client services director.

speech language pathologist.

business development manager.

developer.

nurse.

account manager.

accountant.

writer.

explanation: