WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST URGENT 37.
Akbar runs an ice cream shop. His state government passed a law raising taxes on dairy products over a hundredfold, believing that dairy products were unhealthy. Akbar sued the state for arbitrary taxation. The case was being appealed to the federal courts when the state repeals the tax before collecting any money. Would the federal courts still review the case?

A) No; Akbar lacked standing to bring the case to the courts.

B) No; state laws are not challengeable in federal courts.

C) No; the case is moot since the law was repealed.

D) Yes; there’s a federal interest in preventing similar cases.