subject
Law, 11.06.2021 21:10 kv34

A plaintiff, a resident of State A, filed a complaint against two defendants in a state court in State B, where a car accident between the parties took place. The claims were based solely on state law. One defendant resides in State B, where the accident occurred, and another resides in State C, a neighboring state. The complaint alleged $100,000 in damages. The defendant who resides in State B was personally served with a complaint and summons while he was walking to work. The defendant who resides in State C was served by a process server in the forum state after attending a business meeting in that state. Shortly thereafter, both defendants filed a notice to remove the case to the federal district court in the district where the case was filed. The plaintiff filed a motion to remand. The federal district court granted the motion. What is the most likely reason that the motion was granted

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Law

question
Law, 07.07.2019 02:10
Issues involveing police searches are adressed in the amendment to the constitution a.sixth b.fourth.c.eighth d.fifth
Answers: 1
question
Law, 08.07.2019 02:10
Beth is a victim of carl’s violation of a criminal law. criminal law is concerned with
Answers: 1
question
Law, 09.07.2019 22:10
In which system of gonvernment would states function independently of each other?
Answers: 2
question
Law, 15.07.2019 23:20
What are the ramifications of different interpretations of the relationship between loac and human right laws?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
A plaintiff, a resident of State A, filed a complaint against two defendants in a state court in Sta...
Questions
question
English, 19.12.2019 02:31
question
Biology, 19.12.2019 02:31
question
Social Studies, 19.12.2019 02:31
Questions on the website: 13722359