subject
Law, 20.07.2021 02:50 cathysilvestro

In a state court of general jurisdiction in State A, a debtor, who was a resident of State A, brought suit against a lender, who was an alien with permanent residency status in State B, for violation of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The lender waived personal jurisdiction. Under state procedural rules, venue was proper in the state court. The lender timely removed the action to the federal court for the Northern District of State A, which was the district in which the state court sat. The lender then timely moved to dismiss the action for improper venue, noting that, had the action initially been brought in federal court, the federal court for the Northern District of State A would not have had proper venue over this action. How should the court rule on this motion

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Law

question
Law, 07.07.2019 02:10
Per this theory, juvenile offenders learn to commit crimes through exposure to others. strain theory differential association theory neutralization theory social control theory none of the responses are correct. all of the responses are correct.
Answers: 2
question
Law, 12.07.2019 13:10
5o points! urgent! i need some with these questions: 1. is forced impeachment a legal punishment? yes/ no 2. do personnel have the right to court? yes/no/unsure 3. how long is the statute of limitations for a murder case? * 7 days 3 weeks 1 month unsure 4.
Answers: 2
question
Law, 15.07.2019 03:10
What do floor leaders in congress do
Answers: 1
question
Law, 15.07.2019 09:10
Dumb question? (thats me name: ) can a stakeholder be a leader of an organization?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In a state court of general jurisdiction in State A, a debtor, who was a resident of State A, brough...
Questions
question
Biology, 23.04.2020 21:33
question
Mathematics, 23.04.2020 21:33
Questions on the website: 13722363