subject
Law, 27.09.2021 19:20 stmy1969

Bill Bryan was a defense attorney facing a difficult situation. His client, Clarisse Darrow, was charged with driving while intoxicated and manslaughter of a passenger, her son, who was killed when the care she was driving left the road on a curve and hit a tree. One of the potential jurors, J. T. Scopes, had declared in written and oral voir dire that he could fairly and impartially decide the issues in the case. In fact, when the defense team had reviewed the jury pool, Scopes had been given a green light as a favorable juror by all concerned. However, Mike Hammer, Bryan’s private investigator, had just discovered that Scopes wife was a member of MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving). Unfortunately, before finding this out Bryan has used up all but one of his preemptory challenges and there were still four jury seats to fill. What courses of action are still open to Bryan? What are the dangers associated with them?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Law

question
Law, 10.07.2019 01:20
In recent years, there have been two major criticisms of congress and how it promotes the public good. describe these two in two paragraphs
Answers: 2
question
Law, 12.07.2019 10:10
What is the most common reason people do not vote?
Answers: 2
question
Law, 15.07.2019 23:10
You are a member of the parole board and you hear joe donovan's case. do you grant parole or not? support your answer with at least three supporting facts from the video.
Answers: 3
question
Law, 16.07.2019 21:40
Statute of limitations on debt collection by state
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Bill Bryan was a defense attorney facing a difficult situation. His client, Clarisse Darrow, was cha...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 26.03.2021 04:10
question
Mathematics, 26.03.2021 04:10
question
Mathematics, 26.03.2021 04:10
question
Mathematics, 26.03.2021 04:10
question
Mathematics, 26.03.2021 04:10
Questions on the website: 13722363