subject
Law, 30.09.2021 23:40 cdavis379

Marie Kelly sued the Zaks after she was injured in a headon collision. The Automobile that hit her was driven by Donald Gwinnell. Donald had been at the

Zaks’ home immediately before the accident and had been served a large

amount of alcohol by the Zaks. The Zaks then allowed Donald to drive himself

home during which time he struck the car driven by Marie Kelly. If state law

does not impose liability on the Zaks for Donald’s acts, can the courts hold them

liable for Kelly’s injuries? Why or why not? [Kelly v. Grinnell, 476 A. 2d 1219

(N. J.1984)]

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Law

question
Law, 07.07.2019 02:10
Per this theory, juvenile offenders learn to commit crimes through exposure to others. strain theory differential association theory neutralization theory social control theory none of the responses are correct. all of the responses are correct.
Answers: 2
question
Law, 16.07.2019 17:20
Ageneral requirement for informed consent is that no informed consent may include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject’s legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language? a. your participation in this research is voluntary. if you choose not to participate, or change your mind later, your decision will not affect your relationship with the researcher or your right to other services that you may be eligible for. b. taking part in the research is voluntary, but if you choose to take part, you waive the right to legal redress for any research-related injuries. c. the researcher may stop you from taking part in this research without your consent if you experience side effects that make your emotional condition worse. if you become too emotionally distressed during the research, you may have to drop out. d. in the event of any distress you may have related to this research, you will be given access to appropriate resources.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 18:30
Which statement best explains why article iii of the constitution gives congress the ability to create lower courts inferior to the supreme court "from time to time”? a.the framers of the constitution believed that as the country grew, more courts would be needed to meet its needs. b.the framers of the constitution believed that as courts made unpopular decisions, they would need to be replaced. c.the framers of the constitution wanted to ensure that congress always had more power than the courts. d.the framers of the constitution wanted to ensure that new courts were always being created so new judges could be appointed.
Answers: 3
question
Law, 17.07.2019 00:40
Atemporary committee created to study an issue and make a policy recommendation is called a
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Marie Kelly sued the Zaks after she was injured in a headon collision. The Automobile that hit her...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 26.09.2019 11:00
Questions on the website: 13722367