subject
Law, 12.10.2021 15:30 ctyrector

Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate? explain your reasoning

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Law

question
Law, 09.07.2019 05:20
How does henry’s statement reflect the idea of social contract? how does the idea of social contract protect people’s natural and individual rights
Answers: 2
question
Law, 11.07.2019 18:30
Which of the following developments during the 1780s produced the strongest calls for a new national constitution and government? a.disrespect and abuse toward americans by foreign powersb.political disputes between tories and whigsc.economic chaos in the nationod.failure of states to cooperate with congress
Answers: 2
question
Law, 16.07.2019 21:20
Quid pro quo sexual harassment typically involves
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 21:40
How many districts are there in the federal reserve system
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 21.08.2021 04:50
Questions on the website: 13722362