subject
Law, 30.11.2021 14:00 renee9913

PLEASE HELP ME ASAPP For what reason was Daniel M'Naughten found not guilty in his murder trial? A. A jury had already found him innocent so he couldn't be tried again. B. The jury found that he didn't know that his actions were wrong. C. The jury found him mentally sound to stand trial. D. He was able to prove he acted in self-defense.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Law

question
Law, 14.07.2019 05:20
What should you do when making a personal appeal to a procrastinator to change his/her work habits? a. use examples of how you were able to overcome procrastination to convince him/her to change. b. relay information you have heard from co-workers. c. do not give any personal information. d. explain how you have been personally impacted by his/her procrastination.
Answers: 2
question
Law, 16.07.2019 16:10
Which of the following statements best illustrates an argument on whether congress is effective on providing oversight of the bureaucracy? a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b. congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to show more a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b.congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to further their own interests and not necessarily the public interest. c.congress provides effective oversight of the bureaucracy through the budgetary process. d.congress is not effective in providing oversight because of the budget and enabling legislation.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 17:20
What does england call its police officers?
Answers: 3
question
Law, 16.07.2019 18:30
Adefendant charged with driving while intoxicated pleaded not guilty and insisted on a trial. right before the trial began, he fired his attorney and decided to defend himself. at one point during opening arguments, the defendant began to act like a cat, meowing and chasing an imaginary squirrel out of the courtroom. if no one else raises the issue of the defendant's competency to stand trial, what is the responsibility of the trial judge here? a) the trial judge has no responsibility, because the defendant decided to defend himself. b) the trial judge has no responsibility, because she cannot decide whether the defendant is competent to stand trial. c) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the defendant is representinghimself.d) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the constitution obligates her to do.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
PLEASE HELP ME ASAPP For what reason was Daniel M'Naughten found not guilty in his murder trial? A...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 24.02.2021 16:50
question
Mathematics, 24.02.2021 16:50
question
Mathematics, 24.02.2021 16:50
question
Mathematics, 24.02.2021 16:50
question
Mathematics, 24.02.2021 16:50
question
History, 24.02.2021 16:50
question
Geography, 24.02.2021 16:50
Questions on the website: 13722363