The RCMP have been suspicious of some of the activity on Canal Street. They suspect that someone may be operating a crystal meth lab on the street although they cannot pinpoint a specific house. So over one night on the weekly garbage day, at about 4:a. m. an undercover officer travels, disguised as a visually impaired man along the street with a sniffer dog being presented as a guide dog. The dog sniffs some suspicious materials in the garbage can in front of Ned Schneebly’s house Without Mr. Scheebly’s knowledge and without his consent, the RCMP surreptitiously seize drug paraphernalia from the garbage can which they used to obtain a search warrant which they then used to bust in to Mr. Schneebly’s house where they discovered his crystal meth lab. Mr. Schneebly is charged with running the lab and with trafficking in narcotics.
The matter has now gone to trial. What constitutional issue is now at stake? What argument regarding this constitutional issue would you make if you were the lawyer for the Crown? For the defense? How do you think the matter will be decided? Why? Answer in an essay like format

answer: it could be in all the same frase but if i want to be anyone here in the

same room the sumbiyt

explanation:

i find it more easry on the last too groups of peole and the legem imfortmation that i plot to do so

answer:

murder

explanation:

answer:

In the past the epithet "religion of peace and good will towards men" has been applied to Christianity.[1]

In the 1960s, Malcolm X, acting as a spokesman for the Nation of Islam, said on multiple occasions that Islam was a "religion of peace".[2][3]

In 1996, the Organisation of The Islamic Conference agreed to call for "pragmatic and constructive steps to counter the negative propaganda against Islam; to remove and rectify misunderstandings; and to present the true image of Islam: the religion of peace and tolerance."[4]

In September 2001, in the wake of the September 11 attacks, U.S. President George W. Bush said: "The face of terror is not the true faith of Islam. That's not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace. These terrorists don't represent peace. They represent evil and war."[5][6][7][8] Some have pointed out that the word "Islam" is etymologically related to the Arabic word salām meaning "peace".[9] This prompted criticism from some quarters[10] and a poll of United States Evangelical Protestant leaders taken in 2002 revealed that only 10% agreed with Bush that Islam was synonymous with peace.[11]

Mahathir bin Mohamad, the former Prime Minister of Malaysia said in 2002, "Islam, as I said, is a religion of peace. However through the centuries, deviations from the true teachings of Islam take place. And so [people who call themselves] "Muslims" kill despite the injunction of their religion against killing especially of innocent people.[12]

Dalil Boubakeur, mufti of the Paris Mosque, said in 2006, "The prophet did not found a terrorist religion, but a religion of peace."[13]

Following the 2015 San Bernardino attack, US President Barack Obama used the term, as part of his efforts to counter a perceived anti-Muslim bias, in an address following the attack,[14] and in his first visit to a US mosque.[15]

On March 18, 2016, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi called Islam a religion of peace and called terrorism a dividing force, lauding the peaceful message of Sufism, at World Sufi Conference.[16]