A wholesaler contracted in a signed writing to sell to a bakery 10,000 pounds of flour each week for 10 weeks, the flour to be delivered to the bakery on Mondays and payment to be made on Wednesdays of each week. The bakery did all of its weekly bread baking on Tuesdays. On Monday morning of the first week, the wholesaler tendered delivery of 8,000 pounds of flour to the bakery, and the bakery accepted it on the wholesaler's assurance that the remaining 2,000 pounds would be delivered later that evening, which it was. The bakery paid for both deliveries on Wednesday. On Monday of the second week, the wholesaler tendered delivery of 5,000 pounds of flour to the bakery and said that the remaining 5,000 pounds could not be delivered on Monday but would be delivered by Wednesday. The bakery rejected the tender. Required:
Was the bakery legally justified in rejecting the tender of the 5,000 pounds of flour?

yeah sometimes i dont know why maybe cuhz something is bothering you

answer:

it's very crucial, and many factors of the crime scene can determine what happen during the crime.

Penny Woolcock’s low-budget thriller, The Principles of Lust, is a far more audacious attempt to picklock convention. But it’s a film that loses its grip at the first corner and the director fails to regain control.

There’s an honourable, if alarming, tradition of struggling writers waiting to shoot themselves in the foot in British movies, and Paul (Alec Newman) is the blocked and charming scribe in this bracing, slightly crazed, scenario. At an art exhibition, he falls in love with a sensible single mother, Juliette (Sienna Guillory). Then, for reasons best known to himself, Newman proceeds to throw away his new-found security by hanging out with Billy (Marc Warren), a scary Marquis de Sade figure who gambles ...

answer:

Yes ask. I am expert and mark me Brainliest also.

Explanation: