Can someone asap daryl wrote the following proof to prove that alternate interior angles 3 and 5 are congruent. he made two errors in the proof. identify and correct the errors. steps statements justification 1. pq || rs by given2. angle 1 ≅ angle 3 by vertical angle postulate 3. angle 6 ≅ angle 8 by vertical angle postulate 4. angle 1 ≅ angle 8 by exterior angle postulate 5. angle 3 ≅ angle 5 by transitive property of equality

The errors are in steps 4 and 5. Step 4 would be that angle 1 is supplementary to angle 8, and step 5 would be that angles 3 and 5 are congruent because they are alternate interior angles.

d

step-by-step explanation:

hello and welcome!

so, when we see the words "proportional" along with a table, we need to know that we're looking numbers that divide by the same thing.

looking at this table, we simply have to do a trial and error, and divide to see which numbers have the same quotient. if you look at choice a & c, they both have equal quotients for three of the numbers, with one exception, so those can't be the answer. looking at b, there is no similarity, so that can't be it. then, we see d; if you divide all the numbers in the table, you'll see that they all divide by two, which is a proportional relationship, and our answer!

also, always remember that the x will always be the number that goes into y, and somewhere behind this table, is a formula. for this specific table, the formula would be:

since our x-value is being divided by two to get the y-value. and if they were to ask for more numbers in the series, this is the formula you would use to find them.

529 and 531

step-by-step explanation: