Julie tried to use the law of syllogism to draw a conclusion based on the statements below. explain why she is not able to do so. if ab is bisected by another line segment, two pairs of congruent angles are formed. if ab is bisected by another line segment, segment ab will be cut into two equal sections.

She must use both the statements which includes either bisection of line segments only or bisection of angles only.

Step-by-step explanation:

Julie is not able to prove the law of syllogism by her statements because to prove the law of syllogism she must use both the statements which includes either bisection of line segments only or bisection of angles only.

Instead of doing this she uses one statement that includes the bisection of line segment and another statement that includes the bisection of angles.

The conditional statements are not in the correct form to make a conclusion using the law of syllogism. “If p, then q and if p, then r” cannot be used to draw a conclusion using the law of syllogism. The law of syllogism could be used if the second statement’s hypothesis was “if two pairs of congruent angles are formed.”

Step-by-step explanation:

2 x t divided by n

step-by-step explanation:

f(2x−x2)=−3x2+6x−1

step-by-step explanation:

set up the composite function and evaluate.

f(2x−x2)=−3x2+6x−1