An anthropologist studies a woman's femur that was uncovered in madagascar. to estimate the woman's height, he uses the equation h=60+2.5fh=60+2.5f, where hh represents height in centimeters and ff represents length of the femur in centimeters. which inequality best represents the lengths of the femur that would suggest the woman had a height greater than 160\,\text{cm}160cm? choose 1 f < 30

The inequality best represents the length of the femur that would suggest the woman had a height greater than 160 cm is:

f > 40

Step-by-step explanation:

Woman's height (cm): h = 60 + 2.5 f

Length of the femur (cm): f

Height greater than 160 cm:

h > 160

Replacing h by 60+2.5f in the inequality above:

60+2.5f > 160

Solving for f: Subtracting 60 both sides of the inequality:

60+2.5f-60 > 160-60

Subtracting

2.5f > 100

Dividing both sides of the inequality by 2.5:

2.5f/2.5 > 100/2.5

f > 40

The inequality best represents the length of the femur that would suggest the woman had a height greater than 160 cm is:

f > 40

not only in mathematics, scientific proof also are required in the other field of science. also maths proofs are of particular structure, containing steps and logics. so proving is like doing science, it is science. that's why it is important to prove. 

an inaccurate proof leads to errors, or stating results that are not accurate.  which wil mess the probelm up you dont want this