Can someone me with this geometry proof? it needs to get done asap and i'm really struggling.

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Which graph represents the same relation is the sa which graph represents the same relation as the set {(-3-2)}

Fixed rate mortgage offer: purchase price: $170,000 down payment ($34k): 20% term: 30 years interest rate: 4.25% property tax (yearly): $1,500 homeowner’s insurance (yearly): $1,000 use this example from a fixed-rate mortgage calculator to you answer the questions. keep the page open after you complete this question. according to the calculator, the monthly payment demarco and tanya should anticipate paying for principal and interest is $208. $877. $669. $1,200.