Kelley writes the expression n+2 to model the phrase “xander studied two more hours than nandini.” which best explains the accuracy of kelley’s expression? a.) it is accurate. in the phrase “two more hours than nandini,” “two” is “2,” “more” is “+,” and nandini’s study time is unknown or “n,” so 2+n or n+2 are correct translations. b.) it is inaccurate. in the phrase “two more hours than nandini,” “two” is “2,” “more” is “+,” and nandini’s study time is unknown or “n,” so 2+n is the correct translation. c.) it is inaccurate. in the phrase “two more hours than nandini,” “two” is “2,” “more than” is “> ,” and nandini’s study time is unknown or “n,” so 2> n is the correct translation. d.) it is inaccurate. in the phrase “two more hours than nandini,” “two” is “2,” “more than” is “< ,” and nandini’s study time is unknown or “n,” so 2

A.) It is accurate. In the phrase “two more hours than Nandini,” “two” is “2,” “more” is “+,” and Nandini’s study time is unknown or “n,” so 2+n or n+2 are correct translations.

Step-by-step explanation:

Here,  n is unknown variable, thus it must represent the number of hours Nandini studied.

If Xander studied two more hours than Nandini.

Then,  the number of hours Xander studied = n + 2 or 2 + n

Hence, kalley wrote a right expression.

⇒ Option A is correct.

The answer is A, I took the test.

76%

step-by-step explanation:

24% are dogs and the remaining is 76% because 100-24=76

answer: first option i.e. 'a' is correct.

step-by-step explanation:

since we have given that

number of minutes to wrap a small gift box = 4 minutes

we need to find the number of gifts to be wrapped in 5 minutes

since there is a direct variation, as the number of minutes will increase with   number of gifts to be wrapped.

so, let the number of gifts to be wrapped in 5 minutes be x.

so, it becomes,

hence, first option 'a'   is correct.