Choose the abbreviation of the postulate or theorem that supports the conclusion that was not. given: ws = nt, as = ot, s = t.

The abbreviation that supports the conclusion is SAS

Step-by-step explanation:

Given WS=NT

AS=OT

S=T

We have two triangles named WAS and NOT

where we have two sides (WS=NT and AS=OT)

and an angle(S=T) equal

Since the angle is between the two sides

So the postulate that supports is SAS

i.e Side Angle Side

take it another

no association

step-by-step explanation:

if you have eyes and you can use them efficiently you can see that it just looks like random dots like do a line of best fit and like they're so spread out it's such a weak association you might as well consider it nonexistent