Enter your answer and show all the steps that you use to solve this problem in the space provided.

f
(
x
)
=
9
x
3
+
2
x
2
−
5
x
+
4

and
g
(
x
)
=
5
x
3
−
7
x
+
4
.
what is
f
(
x
)
−
g
(
x
)
?
show all of your steps and write your final answer in factored form.

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

When only separate discreet points are graphed it is called?

Collin did the work to see if 10 is a solution to the equation r/4=2.4