Ice cream sales and the number of shark attacks have a positive correlation. the conclusion that eating ice cream causes shark attacks is
a) justifiable, because the milk in ice cream attracts sharks.
b) justifiable, because a positive correlation implies causation.
c) not justifiable, because a positive correlation negates causation.
d) not justifiable, because ice cream sales and shark attacks both rise during the summer.
will give brainliest

d

step-by-step explanation:

by observation, we can see that the the graph is simply the graph of y = |x| that has been shifted 4 units downwards and 3 units to the left.

we can recognize in choice d :

y = | x + 3 |   - 4 (rewriting in general form)

y = | x - (- 3) |   - 4

the "-4 " term means   that the graph has been shifted by 4 units in the negative y direction

the "-3 " term means   that the graph has been shifted by 3 units in the negative x direction

this matches our observation of the graph described above.

step-by-step explanation:

1. d.90

2. e. none of these (80)

3. a. 0

4. b. 6

5. e. none of these (10)

6. a. 5

hey seth! : )

i’m not 100% sure, but i think it’s b

hope this ya : p

miss u!

- nicole