Mathematics, 30.11.2019 17:31 tursunovarukhshona

If the short leg of a 30-60-90 right triangle is 2 feet. what is the long leg and the hypotenuse?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

30-60-90 triangles are known to have a shortest side that is half of the length of the hypotenuse. Using that fact you can find that the hypotenuse has to be 4 feet in order for the shortest side to be 2 feet.

You can also use the fact that sin(30)=2/h in this triangle which means h=2/sin(30). Since you know that sin(30) can be thought of as sin(π/6), we know that sin(30) has to equal 1/2. That make it so that h=2/(1/2) which equals 4 feet.
I hope this helps let me know in the comments if anything is unclear.

Answer from: Quest

Theirhgghh

Answer from: Quest

when functions are first introduced, you will probably have some simplistic "functions" and relations to deal with, usually being just sets of points. these won't be terribly useful or interesting functions and relations, but your text wants you to get the idea of what the domain and range of a function are. small sets of points are generally the simplest sorts of relations, so your book starts with those.

step-by-step explanation:

state the domain and range of the following relation. is the relation a function?

{(2, –3), (4, 6), (3, –1), (6, 6), (2, 3)}

the above list of points, being a relationship between certain x's and certain y's, is a relation. the domain is all the x-values, and the range is all the y-values. to give the domain and the range, i just list the values without duplication:

domain: {2, 3, 4, 6}

range: {–3, –1, 3, 6}

(it is customary to list these values in numerical order, but it is not required. sets are called "unordered lists", so you can list the numbers in any order you feel like. just don't duplicate: technically, repetitions are okay in sets, but most instructors would count off for this.)

while the given set does indeed represent a relation (because x's and y's are being related to each other), the set they gave me contains two points with the same x-value: (2, –3) and (2, 3). since x = 2 gives me two possible destinations (that is, two possible y-values), then this relation is not a function.

note that all i had to do to check whether the relation was a function was to look for duplicate x-values. if you find any duplicate x-values, then the different y-values mean that you do not have a function. remember: for a relation to be a function, each x-value has to go to one, and only one, y-value.

state the domain and range of the following relation. is the relation a function?

{(–3, 5), (–2, 5), (–1, 5), (0, 5), (1, 5), (2, 5)}

i'll just list the x-values for the domain and the y-values for the range:

Another question on Mathematics

Mathematics, 22.06.2019 02:00

Ethan is proving that the slope between any two points on a straight line is the same. he has already proved that triangles 1 and 2 are similar. drag statements and reasons to complete the proof.

Answers: 1

Answer

Mathematics, 22.06.2019 02:00

Rewrite the expression in z to the n power. the expression i was given is: 1 over z to the negative 1 half power.

Answers: 2

Answer

Mathematics, 22.06.2019 02:30

Nicolo paganini's numbers 1184 and 1210 are amicable. the proper divisors of 1184 are 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 37, 74, 148, 296, and 592. the proper divisors of 1210 are 1, 2, 5, 10, 11, 22, 55, 110, 121, 242, and 605. use the definition of amicable (friendly) numbers to show that they are indeed amicable. which of the folowing statement uses the definition of amicable numbers to show that 1184 and 1210 are indeed amicable? o a. o b. ° c. the sum of proper divisors of 1184 is 1210 and the sum of proper divisors of 1210 is 1184 the sum of proper divisors of 1184 is greater than 1210 and the sum of proper divisors of 1210 is greater than 1184 the sum of proper divisors of 1184 is less than 1210 and the sum of proper divisors of 1210 is less than 1184

Answers: 1

Answer

Mathematics, 22.06.2019 03:20

Apolice office claims that the proportion of people wearing seat belts is less than 65%. to test this claim, a random sample of 200 drivers is taken and its determined that 126 people are wearing seat belts. the following is the setup for this hypothesis test: h0: p=0.65 ha: p< 0.65 find the p-value for this hypothesis test for a proportion and round your answer to 3 decimal places.