subject
Mathematics, 26.06.2019 02:20 lexybellx3

The following “proof” of the vertical angles theorem is invalid. what’s the error in the logic? tell me what’s wrong, not how you would fix it. (2 points) given: lines p and q intersect so that m∠1 + m∠2 = 180°, and m∠2 + m∠3 = 180°. prove: ∠1 ≅ ∠3. statements reasons 1. m∠1 + m∠2 = 180° and m∠2 + m∠3 = 180° 1. given 2. m∠1 + m∠2 = m∠2 + m∠3 2. substitution property of equality 3. m∠1 = m∠3 3. subtraction property of equality 4. ∠1 ≅ ∠3 4. vertical angles theorem

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:40
The human resources manager at a company records the length, in hours, of one shift at work, x. he creates the probability distribution below. what is the probability that a worker chosen at random works at least 8 hours? probability distribution px(x) 6 hours 7 hours 8 hours 9 hours 10 hours 0.62 0.78 пол
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:30
Look at triangle wxy what is the length (in centimeters) of the side wy of the triangle?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:30
Complete each statement from the information given and the triangle criterion you used. if the triangles cannot be shown to be congruent, leave the box for the second triangle blank and choose for reason “cannot be determined.” carbon - regular hexagon. ∆can ≅ ∆ by
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:00
The statements below can be used to prove that the triangles are similar. ? △abc ~ △xyz by the sss similarity theorem. which mathematical statement is missing? ∠b ≅ ∠y ∠b ≅ ∠z
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
The following “proof” of the vertical angles theorem is invalid. what’s the error in the logic? te...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 13.01.2021 21:20
question
Mathematics, 13.01.2021 21:20
question
Mathematics, 13.01.2021 21:20
question
Social Studies, 13.01.2021 21:20
question
Mathematics, 13.01.2021 21:20
Questions on the website: 13722360