Soda cans of a certain kind are labeled as containing 12 ounces. a quality control inspector believes that the mean weight may be more than this, so she performs a hypothesis test of h0: mean = 12 versus h1: mean > 12. she rejects the null hypothesis. which of the following is an appropriate conclusion? a. there is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean weight of the soda in the cans is greater than 12. b. we conclude that the mean weight of soda in the cans is greater than 12.

Someone this asap for a group of students attends a basketball game. * the group buys x hot dogs at the concession stand for $2 each. * the group buys y drinks at the concession stand for $3 each. the group buys 29 items at the concession stand for a total of $70. how many hot dogs did the group buy?

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

In the equation sqrt(n+5)-sqrt(11-10)=1. what is the value of n