More conclusions in january 2002, two students made worldwide headlines by spinning a belgian euro 250 times and getting 140 heads—that’s 56%. that makes the 90% confidence interval (51%, 61%). what does this mean? are these conclusions correct? explain. a) between 51% and 61% of all euros are unfair. b) we are 90% sure that in this experiment this euro landed heads on between 51% and 61% of the spins. c) we are 90% sure that spun euros will land heads between 51% and 61% of the time. d) if you spin a euro many times, you can be 90% sure of getting between 51% and 61% heads. e) ninety percent of all spun euros will land heads between 51% and 61% of the time.

i dont know

step-by-step explanation:

is there more to this question?

alright so i think for this one it would to draw it out. this may be hard for me to try and draw, but i will do my best on here:

        r

  /       |     \

notice how it forms 2 triangles inside one bigger triangle.

so if we know the angle spr is the same as psr that is saying the measure of angle p is the same as angle s. this means the big triangle psr is either isosceles or equilateral. in both cases, the triangle is perfectly symmetrical when split down the middle, which is in this case rq. because we know it is perfectly symmetrical on both sides, we know that the two triangles inside the bigger one are equal.