Agroup of students estimated the length of one minute without reference to a watch or clock, and the times (seconds) are listed below. use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that these times are from a population with a mean equal to 60 seconds. does it appear that students are reasonably good at estimating one minute? 70 79 38 63 44 23 62 61 67 50 61 70 94 87 65

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that a group of students estimated the length of one minute without reference to a watch or clock, and the times (seconds) are listed below.

Data set is as ollows:

70 79 38 63 44 23 62 61 67 50 61 70 94 87 65

H0: mu = 60 sec

Ha: mu not equals 60 sec

Mean diff = 2.27

Test statistic = 2.27/SE =0.4815

p value =0.6376

Since p>0.05, we accept null hypothesis

i.e. there is statistical evidence to say that students are reasonably good at estimating one minute

so firstly, we need to isolate the y variables to be able to solve these inequalities. firstly, add 0.5x on both sides of the first inequality and subtract 1.5x on both sides of the second inequality:

now since the slope is positive for the first inequality, this means that the line going upwards belongs to the first inequality, and the line going downwards belongs to the second inequality.

next, since y ≥ in the first inequality, this means that the shaded region will be above the first inequality's line, thus shading regions a and b.

next, since y ≤ in the second inequality, this means that the shaded region is going to be below this line, thus shading regions a and c.

since both lines shade region a, this means that region a is the solution.

step-by-step explanation:

mark brainliest!

answer: a) 56% women

b)44% men

step-by-step explanation: