Suppose a mutual fund qualifies as having moderate risk if the standard deviation of its monthly rate of return is less than 6%. a mutual-fund rating agency randomly selects 24 months and determines the rate of return for a certain fund. the standard deviation of the rate of return is computed to be 4.37%. is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the fund has moderate risk at the alpha equals 0.10 level of significance? a normal probability plot indicates that the monthly rates of return are normally distributed.

answer:

payment just for service  

→

$

87.12

payment for service including tax

→

$

94.09

explanation:

service only with 20% tip  

→

$

72.6

(

1

+

20

100

)

=

$

87.12

in the opening of the question the word 'service' is associated only with the pretax value.

the closing part of the question asks: how much did she pay for the  

service

−−−−−−  

so technically the answer is  

→

$

72.6

(

1

+

20

100

)

=

$

87.12

however, the intention of the question provider may have been that your answer is to be  

$

87.12

(

1

+

8

100

)

=

$

94.09

to 2 decimal places.

'

payment just for service  

→

$

87.12

payment for service including tax

→

$

94.09

tony b

mar 21, 2017

answer:

trying to explain it another way

explanation:

service charge  

.

→

$

72.60

20% tip  

20

100

×

$

72.60

=

$

14.52

−−−−−−  

←

add

$

87.12

tax  

8

100

×

$

87.12

=

$

6.97

−−−−−  

←

add

$

94.09

related questions

i got 10.28 but that rounds up to 10.3

step-by-step explanation:

i found the koficent of the linear function and i foun c acordind to the strict formula y=kx+c and then i took 2 as an x and replacet it on the formula i found and then foun the y

what's the question?

step-by-step explanation:

there is no question.