9. a company that sells computers and other electronic eg
some new sales staff. the company offers salary packages that combine a base
salary and commissions from sales. it is willing to pay a base salary of between
$20,000 and $30,000 per year and a commission rate between 2.5% and 6.5% of
total sales per year. the company has a rule that if someone makes the maximum
base salary, he or she cannot earn the highest commission rate, and vice versa.
a. javier is very confident in his ability to generate large sales. what salary
package would appeal to him? explain your reasoning, and write an
algebraic expression for javier's salary package.
b. catherine prefers to have a more stable income that is less affected by sales.
what salary package would appeal to her? explain your reasoning, and write
an algebraic expression for her salary package.
c. for what amounts of sales will catherine make more than javier? use your
expressions from parts a and b to write and solve an inequality to find the
answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

Sorry I don't know this awnser. Why am I even here if I don't know to awnser the question. your not the only one who is having this problem cause I have this type of problem and the people have this problem. Hopefully someday I find this on a paper and get some extra help because it is really hard and I get confused and left behind and I really really reeey need help so bad. and I need an advice from others too.

required rate of return = 0.166 = 16.6%

step-by-step explanation:

under the capital asset pricing model (capm), the required or expected rate of return for a particular security or asset is given using the formula:

required rate of return = risk-free rate + beta*(market risk premium)

we are given that;

risk-free rate = 4% = 0.04

beta = 1.4

market risk premium = 9% = 0.09

we simply plug these values into the above formula;

required rate of return = 0.04 + 1.4*(0.09)

required rate of return = 0.04 + 0.126

required rate of return = 0.166 = 16.6%

d. corresponding side lengths in similar triangles are proportional in length.

step-by-step explanation: