write down the negation of each statement
1. ∃y ∈z such that ∀x ∈z, r (x + y)
2. ∀x ∈z, ∃y∈z such that r(x + y)

1. ∀ y ∈ Z such that ∃ x ∈ Z, ¬R (x + y)

2. ∃ x ∈ Z, ∀ y ∈ Z such that ¬R(x + y)

Step-by-step explanation:

If we negate a quantified statement, first we negate all the quantifiers in the statement from left to right, ( keeping the same order ) then we negative the statement,

Here, the given statement,

1. ∃y ∈Z such that ∀x ∈Z, R (x + y)

By the above definition,

Negation of this statement is ∀ y ∈ Z such that ∃ x ∈ Z, ¬R (x + y),

2. Similarly,

The negation of statement ∀x ∈Z, ∃y∈Z such that R(x + y),

∃ x ∈ Z, ∀ y ∈ Z such that ¬R(x + y)

the figures below are made out of circles, semicircles, quarter … find the area and the perimeter of each figure and give your answers as a completely simplified exact value in terms of π (no approximations). remember that we'll also have to cut whatever areas we get in half, since we're only dealing

step-by-step explanation:

b i think

step-by-step explanation:

not really sure