Criminal investigators use biometric matching for fingerprint recognition, facial recognition, and iris recognition. when matching fingerprints, each subject is given a mean match score for how well their fingerprint matches the given fingerprint, based on different criteria. there are six criteria used to calculate the match score. the mean match score used by a particular police department is 80. if the police department finds a higher match score than this number, they consider the person a fingerprint match and a suspect in the crime. the null hypothesis is that the mean match score is 80. the alternative hypothesis is that the mean match score is greater than 80. is the following a type i error or a type ii error or neither? the test shows that the mean match score is more than 80 when the person does not actually have a fingerprint match. group of answer choices type i error type ii error

Type I error.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's remember the definition of Type I error and Type II error:

A type I error is the rejection of a true null hypothesis, this means that we would get a "false positive" with this error.

A type II error is the non rejection of a not true null hypothesis, this error would give us a "false negative".

In this problem, we are told that the mean match score to identify a suspect is 80. However, the test shows that the mean match score is more than 80 when the person doesn't have a fingerprint match (and therefore the person would not be a suspect). Therefore, this person would appear as a suspect when he/she really isn't one. This means that the test is giving a "false positive". Thus, this is a type I error.

1/2*qr*rs

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation: the declaration of the rights of man and of the citizen (french: déclaration des droits de l'homme et du citoyen de 1789), set by france's national constituent assembly in 1789, is a human civil rights document from the french revolution.[1]

the declaration was drafted by the abbé sieyès and the marquis de lafayette, in consultation with thomas jefferson.[2] influenced by the doctrine of "natural right", the rights of man are held to be universal: valid at all times and in every place, pertaining to human nature itself. it became the basis for a nation of free individuals protected equally by the law. it is included in the beginning of the constitutions of both the fourth french republic (1946) and fifth republic (1958) and is still current. inspired by the enlightenment philosophers, the declaration was a core statement of the values of the french revolution and had a major impact on the development of freedom and democracy in europe and worldwide.[3]

the 1789 declaration, together with the 1215 magna carta, the 1689 english bill of rights (1689), the 1776 united states declaration of independence, and the 1789 united states bill of rights, inspired in large part the 1948 united nations universal declaration of human rights