Tanya bought 3 games on her phone that each cost the same amount. tony bought 4 games on his phone that each cost the same amount, but each was $.50 less than the games that tanya bought. both tanya and tony paid the same amount of money. what was the cost of one of tanyas games

(a) write an expression that shows tanyas 's purchased games

(b) write an expression that shows tony's purchased games

(c) write an equation that you can solve to see the cost of each person's games/ let x represent the cost of one of tanyas games

(d)solve the equation. show your work

(e)what was the cost of one of tony's games

A.)3x  

B.) 4(x-0.5)  

C.)3x=4(x-0.5)

D.)x=2 Tanya bought 2$ games

E.)  Tony bought $1.5 games

Step-by-step explanation:

A.) She has 3 games that cost the same amount so the cost is 3x

B.) He has 4 games that all cost .5 less then her but they also are the same amount as his other games.           So each of her games is subtracted by .5 then multiplied by 4. So the cost is 4(x-0.5)

C.) the two peoples games cost the same amount as the others so use those two original equations and put an equal sign   3x=4(x-0.5)

D.)

-2/-1=2                                       x=2

E.)

To find his you have to input this into the equation

4(x-0.5)     4(2-0.5)       4(1.5) so his cost of each game is $1.5

is only a line? i think so

the results from a pre-test for students for the year 2000 and the year 2010 are illustrated in the box plot. what do these results tell us about how students performed on the 29 question pre-test for the two years?

if we compare only the lowest and highest scores between the two years, we might conclude that the students in 2010 did better than the students in 2010. this conclusion seems to follow since the lowest score of 8 in 2010 is greater in value than the lowest score of 6 in 2000. also, the highest score of 28 in 2010 is greater in value than the highest score of 27 in 2000.

but the box portion of the illustration gives us more detailed information. the middle bar in each box shows us that the median score of 20 in 2000 is greater in value than the median score of 17 in 2010. further, we note that the box and whiskers divide the illustration into four pieces. each of these four pieces represents the same portion of students. so, the upper half of the students in 2000 scored in the same score range as the upper one-fourth of the students in 2010, see the illustration at a score of 20.

by considering the upper one-fourth, upper half, and upper three-fourths instead of just the lowest and highest scores, we would conclude that the students as a whole did much better in 2000 than in 2010. we would conclude that as a whole the students in 2010 are less prepared than the students in 2000.

in this section, we discuss box-and-whisker plots and the five key values used in constructing a box-and-whisker plot. the key values are called a five-number summary, which consists of the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

step-by-step explanation: