subject
Mathematics, 03.12.2019 21:31 luisaareli6298

Suppose a value of 130 mg/dl or higher was considered positive and the prevalence of undetected diabetes remained the same as questions 2-3 ( available for refrence below)how would you predict sensitivity (se) would be affected by this change? why? guess without calculation! sensitivity would be [ select one] ["increased", "no change", "decreased"] because [ select one] ["tp", "tn", "fp", "fn"] will decreasehow would you predict specificity would be affected by this change ? why? guess without calculation! specificity would be [ select one] ["decreased", "", "increased", "no change"] because [ select one ] ["tp", "fn", "fp", "tn"] will increase. compare sensitivity and specificity and observe how the number in cell a, b, c, and d is changing when you change the cutoff point from high to low (from 180 mg/dl to 130 mg/dl) .sensitivity = tp /(tp + fn) = a/(a+c)specificity = tn /(fp + tn) = b/(b+d

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:30
What is the base of 1/9 to the power of 2
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:50
Given: pqrs is a parallelogram prove: pr and qs bisect each other at t
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:30
In the given triangle, ∠aed ∼ ∠ abc, ad = 6.9, ae = 7.2, de = 5.2, and bc = 10.2. find the measure of bd and ce. round your answer to the nearest tenth.
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:00
The median am of triangle ∆abc is half the length of the side towards which it is drawn, bc . prove that triangle ∆abc is a right triangle, and find angle mac and abm
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Suppose a value of 130 mg/dl or higher was considered positive and the prevalence of undetected diab...
Questions
question
English, 19.07.2019 22:30
question
Mathematics, 19.07.2019 22:30
Questions on the website: 13722363