Which best proves why the expressions 4(x+3)+2x and 6(x+2) must be equivalent expressions?
when x= 3, both expressions have a value of 30.
when x=5, both expressions have a value of 42.
when x= 1, both expressions have a value of 18, and when x=8, both expressions have a value of 60.
when x= 2, both expressions have a value of 15, and when x-6, both expressions have a value of 39.

step-by-step explanation:

if you want to separate 54 into 6 individual tiers then you need to divide if you want to separate 54 into 6 individual tiers then you need to divide 6 and 54.

if you divide 9 by 6 you will get 54.

- hope i .

this is the formula: v = the value of investment at the end of the time period

p = the principal amount (the initial amount invested)

r = the annual interest rate

n = the annual frequency of compounding (how many times a year interest is added)

t = the number of years the money is invested

^ means raise to the power of